We get InfoTerrorism
can sometimes come with
that could mix
need to wait for
that should not come confused with
that must live in
which has a relative in
but not in
that belongs to
with a distant child of
who knows nothing about
which comes in love with
which perhaps requires
With Biases towards terroristicalities
which could come as
but could have
could come to a
to make a new cell of
yet to be
nameterror InstaTerrorism cooptingterrorists fluxterror workshoppingterrorism traficterror modelTerrorism timeterrorism runterrorists showerTerrorists showerterror Showerterrorism showerterrorisationism showerterrorisation showerTerrorTerrorism ShowerTerrorismTerror showerTerrorTerrorisationIsm showerTerrirismationTerrorists showerTerrorTerrorisationTerroristTerrorism showerTerrorismTerroristTerrorTerrorisation
Coming from Terrorism?
Yes. All these terror suffixes come to have a mistaken quality of ridiculousness about them.
Yes. In a way that we can ridicule as much as we want, however, for a person – or a group – who feels threatened by some other person’s tendency to wear orange because they think it shines pretty badly indeed upon their own green coloured preferences, yes they can feel genuinely threatened.
So WTF comes as “MorphicTerror” if not some kind of ridicule?
Yes. It can come as a smile pointed towards over usage of Terror suffix, however, I think, another element comes slightly more prominent there. The question that swings from a possible Genuine feeling of live under MorphicTerror as unpleasant, seems that in case that Fear For Life perhaps should have it’s own Authentic way of showing up, expressing and sharing.
Let’s try to avoid the wide range of interpretations for the term “terror” and what comes within the scope, and assume that someone reflected on the term and decided to use it for sharing something they feel strongly about GafaTapeUsage, eg
I think the question comes as: Where you really really really do indeed feel some kind of massive negativity from Gafatape usage – why stick the term Terrorism at the end? Would something else come to Better convey how you really really indeedly do feel? That’s a question from contemporary terrorism IMHO.
Yes. Perhaps that comes as a beginning, a thread to pull on.
Could this come as AuthenticTerrorisation?
The terror of Authenticity?
How about AuthenticPhobia?
LOL You misunderstood! AuthenticTerrorism comes as the terrorisation of anyone authentic. AuthenticPhobia could live as the mental casualty of the terror upon authenticity that keeps coming.
OK.. A Good point. However, why not call that push against authenticity as an Error? Eg AuthenticErrorism? or AntiAuthenticIsm? or VioAuthentic?
Violence against authenticity.
Coming from Ism?
We could consider the question from a different space. The range of Ism. Ism comes, generally, in 2.5 different cloaks –
0.5? as a general activity one happens to do. Sell flowers? Florist. Drive a motor car? A motorist.
We get an Ist, like a dadaIst, without the ism. No Flowerism, or Motorism required. Unless, the process of flowering, or motoring can come as Flowerism and Motorism respectively. (an ism that comes in the following 2 kinds..)
sure, we get some grey areas, like an educationalist might not work as a teacher, nor even connected to any formal or pedagogical practice. We can get a educationalist as doing educational stuff, like a biologist, and an educationalist who believes in education as some kind of a solution for a problem.
Here come the 2 kinds:
as a processes or activities. eg transformation of energies from different conditions – metabolism. a mind reading the former sentence and thinking: “is this really best way to put ‘metabolism’?? – yes, criticism.
another way of Ismlife
comes as an Aimed-For contingent process. where-as to criticism this text one need not Believe in criticality for doing a reading that questions the text’s very reason to live, we do have various ways to do the criticality which come contingently. We can do a feminist, compositionalist, statist, modernist, culturalist, capitalist – and so on – critical productions. These contingent Isms, seemingly bourne via some kind of biased choices, perhaps used to come as a suffix for all sorts of activities which fancied – genuinely – to distinguish themselves from other.
A ModernFuturist’s time-to-come, has a different life to the AfroFuturist sense of future.
Like terror, there used to come a fair bit of resentment-come-critique (or the other way around??)
from seeming over usage. However there comes a crucial, i think, difference,
who calls who what.
In fascisim’s golden days, people called themselves Fascists. We might have some who still do, however, i think it’s fair to say that most usage of the term comes like that of the terror –
no one calls themselves a terrorist.