the thinking here has to do with qualities of, between and infinities through sensations of fluctism -strophe bend bias.
these sensations come in a certain spectrum – aka an infinity – however each offers a variant aspect. Each can come as a part, a piece of and from, sensations that no matter how we turn, that very turn produces it’s of vibrations, own fluctuations that make their own biases, bends and kinds of -strophes. (eg, anastrophe, catastrophe, and so on.)
indeed, the title here could have had the word Turn, however wanted to leave stuff to be added later into the spectrum. Swivel can come as an aspect of the range too.
however, the wind in this note has to do with How these terms come imagined. How these sensations live through the fluctuations of thoughts. it’s a curious How – a practice of bending with means, of moving with the way something or another comes to have sensations.
in this spectrum of accentuations, the question of meta processes, moves that seemingly Re-Flect and Re-Flex from something Other than themselves.
Here’s an example:
Suppose you make Tea. The drink. heat some water, pour into a cup, add a tea bag – boom, here’s some tea to drink.
The Meta consideration process will move something like:
We have tea, now let’s think outside of the actual tea – reflect upon it – suggestive a certain perspective and distance from the tea itself.
We get something, and a meta process away from that thing – eg, tea.
With fluct ranges in mind, there’s a certain difference from the meta process involved stuff like Tea. Notice there’s no Re-flect, or Re-flex, since we come to imagine imagining through the bending move itself!
The meta act, the sort of Stepping-Out and think – consider – something other than the space of where we are, isn’t afforded when considering the turn itself.
Stop reading, get up and do a turn – how can you take your body Out of the turn itself?
There’s one part of your body that can produce such a fit – the brain. You can use the brain to consider the turn itself, reflect upon how, for example, position your feet as you make a turn, and so on.
However, when we consider that the Turning sensation is within other, not same but similar sensations in some kind of a connected space – aka spectrum – the consideration of the turning becomes a different question.
Suppose i had no legs. Suppose i was in a wheelchair. Suppose i stopped reading and made a quick turn on the wheelchair, held one wheel with one hand, pushed another with the other hand – and YAY!.
However, the meta process, the imagining how to imagine turning, might take a different Bend, an other kind of fluctuation, then the case of having feet to turn with.
Having feet, or having a wheelchair to turn with – offer particular biases to consider.
Both bound by certain physicalities that offer their own constraints, and indeed – in these examples – by imaginal processes that align themselves with imagining through possibilities that reside away from the imagination itself.
Here the question was: how to consider imagining the turning of this or that body – a question with it’s own bias.
We could have had a question with a different kind of a bendy bias – that from focusing only on imagining the imagination of body – and kind of a body – turning.
All this may seem a bit confusing. A bit like thinking of thinking that thinks about the thinking that thinks the thinking of the thing that thinks – and so on.
However, that is precisely how the perception of ranges and spectrums come handy. Where, as is in flective practices (a bunch of words i should really clarify somewhere), we go to do the practices that form(?) – allow other processes through – perhaps instead of cascading through stuff like the category of all other categories that has a category which is in some other meta category, something that rings of power games – we can simply take meta elements themselves.
A category comes as a meta element, so a series, or a colour of colours.
Anyhow.. to wrap up this note – we get the meta consideration comes as already biased. Already with it’s own accent since life comes as a fluctistic practice. A question of how to fluctuate, since once in – there’s no way out! Even death will not de-bind from fluctuating. A process of various -stophes in the minds of those who witness the dead.
While this may seem very abstract and remote, i think the question comes in various ways to various spaces. The space we call cyber – a certain contradiction since we hardly have spaces that refuse navigation – comes with algorithms and bots that human complain about as bias. They have to come bias – question How that bendy bias lives. A question that will soon turn into how we imagining imagine the fluct spectrum – since imagining comes with it’s own fluctuations as well.